Comments for Paul Boone

Comment on Ruby Daemons: Verifying Good Behavior by Brazen

Brazen — Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:27:09 +0000

I specifically came hear looking for inotify information, but this whole page is a goldmine.

Comment on Ruby Daemons: Verifying Good Behavior by Kristleifur Daðason

Kristleifur Daðason — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:06:34 +0000

Nice, thanks. I especially like the closing sentence, I needed the reassurance.

Comment on Quiz: which ruby program uses more CPU? by Ennuyer.net » Blog Archive » 2009-03-15- Today’s Ruby/Rails Reading

Ennuyer.net » Blog Archive » 2009-03-15- Today’s Ruby/Rails Reading — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:22:03 +0000

[...] Quiz: which ruby program uses more CPU? [...]

Comment on Ruby: Overriding Class.new to make custom wrapper pattern by Chris Eppstein

Chris Eppstein — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:24 +0000

This code can be simplified a bit and can also be made more reusable.

http://gist.github.com/62556

in the singleton_super_version.rb file, you can see that you can use super when in the singleton class to access methods in the superclass.

in the module_inclusion.rb file, you’ll see that the method you present is a shortcut when you don’t want your behavior to be resused, I think it’s better to have a separate module for this type of thing.

Good post!

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by 10 Giải pháp công nghệ Java cho năm 2009 « Phùng Hải Nam’s Weblog

10 Giải pháp công nghệ Java cho năm 2009 « Phùng Hải Nam’s Weblog — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:02:50 +0000

[...] and JBoss AS 5, it would be sane to consider and evaluate JRuby to co-exist with Java. Also as Merb is faster running on JRuby and Merb will join forces with Rails to become Rails 3.0 would be another reason to evaluate JRuby [...]

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by 10 Java Technology Resolution for 2009 « Joshua Java

10 Java Technology Resolution for 2009 « Joshua Java — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:14:24 +0000

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by The Nightly Build » Blog Archive » Why merb over rails? Anyone?

The Nightly Build » Blog Archive » Why merb over rails? Anyone? — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:43:15 +0000

[...] http://www.mindbucket.com/2008/09/18/rails-merb-performance-comparison-on-mongrel-jruby-tomcat-glass... Merb The Super Bike Of Frameworks View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: ruby rails) [...]

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) | JRuby Matters

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:02:32 +0000

[...] great write-up by Paul Boone of various configurations using both MRI and JRuby, different versions of Rails, and [...]

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by Dick Davies

Dick Davies — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:58:55 +0000

Is there any particular reason you didn’t want to test concurrent connections?

Comment on Rails / Merb performance comparison (on mongrel, jruby, tomcat, glassfish) by Yehuda Katz

Yehuda Katz — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 05:59:13 +0000

I am also interested in seeing the edge-rails results. However, unlike Rails, when Merb is slow, it’s usually the result of a tiny mistake that’s easy to fix (this slowdown was the result of a single, small commit that was easy to revert). Rails, on the other hand, has its performance issues very spread out.

That said, they have been adding performance improvements en masse, so I’d be interested in seeing it. I’d love a little speed war to heat up :)